WPBSA permanently expels Graeme Dott after historic sexual abuse conviction

On August 24, 2026, the world of snooker received a heavy announcement: Graeme Dott, the 2026 world champion, had been permanently expelled as a member by WPBSA – the World Professional Billiards and Snooker Association. The decision came just hours after the High Court in Glasgow found Dott guilty of lewd and libidinous behaviour linked to historic sexual abuse. Beyond the loss of membership, the legal verdict effectively ended a playing career that had spanned more than two decades. For long-time snooker followers, Dott was once known as a determined fighter with a gritty style. From now on, Dott's name will be remembered for a conduct scandal rather than clearances or memorable finals. WPBSA said an emergency board meeting was held immediately after the conviction and the decision to revoke his membership permanently was unanimous. This is the most severe sanction available under the WPBSA constitution. The unanimous vote showed that the board did not regard the case as something to be treated leniently. WPBSA also asked World Snooker Tour to remove Graeme Dott from the Hall of Fame. This extends the disciplinary impact into snooker's historical legacy, not merely his current playing status. The disciplinary framework relies on WPBSA constitutional rule, especially Articles 24.2, 24.3 and 24.5. Article 24.2 allows WPBSA to expel a member. Articles 24.3 and 24.5 set out the notification process and the way an appeal should be handled by a general meeting of members. Dott retains appeal rights under the constitution. He has 21 days from notification to submit an appeal. If the appeal is considered, the case can go before a general meeting, where the final decision may require a special resolution. This creates a balance between decisive action and due process. The wider snooker ecosystem is watching closely. Sponsors, broadcasters and commercial partners will assess how the governing bodies manage the fallout. A sport known for politeness and decorum could be seriously damaged if the governing body is seen as too lenient or opaque. WPBSA did not wait for the conviction before acting. The suspension from April 9, 2026, followed by removal from the ranking list at the end of the 2026/26 season, and then permanent revocation, shows a staged governance approach. For fans in Scotland, this is a sad and shocking development. Dott had been one of the country's leading players in the modern era. His resilient style and strong safety play made him a respected figure. That chapter must now close in an entirely different way. Public debate will likely focus on whether the punishment was too late or why Dott was allowed to remain in the professional structure until the case concluded. WPBSA has defended its actions, saying it acted as soon as the criminal verdict was delivered. The request to remove Dott from the Hall of Fame sends a powerful signal about the standards expected from players. Inducting a player into the Hall of Fame is not just about skill; it is about representing the values of the sport. If Dott remained honoured, that would undermine the message WPBSA wants to send. The coming days will reveal whether Dott appeals. An appeal could create a longer legal process. Yet, even if the appeal succeeds on procedural grounds, his reputation may never fully recover. This case is a reminder that a professional sports career is measured not only by trophies and rankings, but also by conduct away from the arena.